Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Commuting
Reload this Page >

Why NOT a Surly Cross Check?

Search
Notices
Commuting Bicycle commuting is easier than you think, before you know it, you'll be hooked. Learn the tips, hints, equipment, safety requirements for safely riding your bike to work.

Why NOT a Surly Cross Check?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-06-11, 02:07 PM
  #26  
Senior Member
 
tjspiel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 8,101
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 52 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 17 Times in 13 Posts
Originally Posted by trafficcasauras
semi horizontal dropouts slipping
The horizontal dropouts add to the versatility of the frame since it makes it easier to run an IGH, or FG/SS. If you have a problem with slipping, Surly's got you covered:

tjspiel is offline  
Old 09-06-11, 02:17 PM
  #27  
Senior Member
 
ortcutt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Cambridge MA
Posts: 289
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Shimagnolo
Originally Posted by trafficcasauras
semi horizontal dropouts slipping
Bingo.
That is why I bought the Soma DoubleCross with modern vertical dropouts, instead of those antiquated semi horizontal dropouts.
I've never had trouble with axle slippage on my CC. Nor, for that matter, on my other steel frame, with which I run QR skewers. Since they play well with all my hubs -- flip-flop, IGH, and cassette -- I love my semi-horizontals!
ortcutt is offline  
Old 09-06-11, 02:36 PM
  #28  
Senior Member
 
Shimagnolo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Zang's Spur, CO
Posts: 9,086
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3392 Post(s)
Liked 5,571 Times in 2,890 Posts
Originally Posted by tjspiel
The horizontal dropouts add to the versatility of the frame since it makes it easier to run an IGH, or FG/SS. If you have a problem with slipping, Surly's got you covered:

Interesting. Hadn't heard of the Tuggnut.
Might need to pick one up for the GF's bike.
She had a slippage incident just the other day.
Shimagnolo is offline  
Old 09-06-11, 03:41 PM
  #29  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 16
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by PaulRivers
A lot of people here have heard of Surly...I think it's still pretty brand name to bike thieves.
That's a good point-I was planning on taking the logos off to make it harder to identify. And though it may not make sense to people who live outside of the Twin Cities area, I'm in St. Paul, where I don't feel the populace is as bike savvy as our big brother to the west ;-)
ande7977 is offline  
Old 09-06-11, 03:45 PM
  #30  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 6,432
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 539 Post(s)
Liked 44 Times in 38 Posts
lol

It's getting the logos off that I wondered about...one could paint over them, but it's not like they just peel off.
PaulRivers is offline  
Old 09-06-11, 03:48 PM
  #31  
Senior Member
 
Shimagnolo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Zang's Spur, CO
Posts: 9,086
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3392 Post(s)
Liked 5,571 Times in 2,890 Posts
Originally Posted by PaulRivers
lol

It's getting the logos off that I wondered about...one could paint over them, but it's not like they just peel off.
Removing Surly decals: https://www.surlybikes.com/blog/spew/...d_drivetrains/
Shimagnolo is offline  
Old 09-06-11, 03:49 PM
  #32  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 6,432
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 539 Post(s)
Liked 44 Times in 38 Posts
Oh wow, interesting...
PaulRivers is offline  
Old 09-06-11, 03:51 PM
  #33  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 16
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Andy_K
The main flaw I see in your plan is that you put "just in case" here and said "next" fall. You should get a cyclocross bike and do cyclocross now.


If you are able to keep your mind set on the Cross Check as strictly a utility bike, you may be able to avoid this problem. Get an ugly color -- it helps with that. Look for a used Beef Gravy Brown. I made the mistake of having mine powder-coated a beautiful translucent blue. Now it wants to be a race bike, but it can't do it.
Unfortunately, I have some other obligations this fall-I do hope to head out to some practice sessions though.

IRT use as a utility bike-thankfully, I have another road bike to keep me from wanting the CC (or whatever bike I get) to do more than it wants to or is capable of. A comfortable bike for commutes, or that can handle rides in sloppy weather/crappy roads and not have me worry about the higher end parts is what I'm hoping for.
ande7977 is offline  
Old 09-06-11, 03:56 PM
  #34  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 16
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Shimagnolo
Awesome-thanks for the post. I won't lie, Surly's pragmatism in how they approach their bikes is what makes them a more alluring brand (and no, I'm not a hipster.) I can't imagine many bike manufacturers (or any brand name businesses) publishing how to go about de-branding their bikes to make them anonymous.
ande7977 is offline  
Old 09-06-11, 04:08 PM
  #35  
Descends like a rock
 
pallen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 4,034

Bikes: Scott Foil, Surly Pacer

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Liked 16 Times in 8 Posts
Originally Posted by Shimagnolo
exactly what I did with my Pacer. I kept the headbadge though.
pallen is offline  
Old 09-06-11, 04:09 PM
  #36  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,251
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
not that it's for you, but i'm pretty happy with my CC. Just did a 2000 mile tour with it and use it daily as a commuter. Changed the saddle to a Brooks Flyer and the brakes for Shimano BR-R550's. Worked out pretty nicely.
SurlyLaika is offline  
Old 09-06-11, 04:18 PM
  #37  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 51
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Then there's the issue of No Lugs. Which would make me lean towards a Singular Peregrine:

https://www.singularcycles.com/peregrine.html

(This is all aesthetics, of course. But it's a very pretty bike.)
visigoth is offline  
Old 09-06-11, 07:27 PM
  #38  
Senior Member
 
canyoneagle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Santa Fe, NM
Posts: 4,599

Bikes: Vassago Moosknuckle Ti 29+ XTR, 90's Merckx Corsa-01 9sp Record, PROJECT: 1954 Frejus SuperCorsa

Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 174 Post(s)
Liked 157 Times in 75 Posts
Originally Posted by tjspiel
If you want disc brakes you're out of luck on the Cross Check. I saw a blog post from Surly about why they don't put disc tabs on the CC and it mostly came down to fork design. Discs require a tougher fork and they thought that would have a negative impact on the ride quality.

Other options could be the Salsa Vaya or even Fargo.
The new LHT will have disc tabs.
canyoneagle is offline  
Old 09-06-11, 07:44 PM
  #39  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 16
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by canyoneagle
The new LHT will have disc tabs.
Hmmm....now perhaps it's between the LHT and CC....or both?
ande7977 is offline  
Old 09-06-11, 07:54 PM
  #40  
Retro-nerd
 
georgiaboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Morningside - Atlanta
Posts: 1,638

Bikes: 1991 Serotta Colorado II, 1986 Vitus 979, 1971 Juene Classic, 2008 Surly Crosscheck, 1956 Riva Sport

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 30 Post(s)
Liked 57 Times in 39 Posts
Funny how no one mentions the Bianchi Volpe anymore.
__________________
Would you like a dream with that?
georgiaboy is offline  
Old 09-06-11, 08:07 PM
  #41  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 16
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by georgiaboy
Funny how no one mentions the Bianchi Volpe anymore.
I test rode it-a great bike-but was a rougher ride than expected. Granted-I was forced to test ride a bike that was smaller than my ideal (I believe it was a 57cm) but they were getting a 61 in that would prove a better test. Don't worry, it's also on my short list. Any thoughts on how it serves as a commuter?
ande7977 is offline  
Old 09-10-11, 03:02 PM
  #42  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 5,202
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 138 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 81 Times in 64 Posts
Ande, $.02 to throw in the hopper, I've been commuting with a CC for a couple years with racks in the front or rear and pannier loads in the front OR rear. What I've found is that the CC handles a lot better with panniers in the front than back. When out of the saddle and sprinting when there's panniers on the rear the whole bike kind of whips about a bit, with the panniers in the front it feels like the whole bike is a lot more solid and ones line is a lot straighter and turns more predictable.

Last edited by LeeG; 09-10-11 at 04:20 PM.
LeeG is offline  
Old 09-10-11, 03:28 PM
  #43  
CRIKEY!!!!!!!
 
Cyclaholic's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: all the way down under
Posts: 4,276

Bikes: several

Mentioned: 37 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1590 Post(s)
Liked 689 Times in 366 Posts
Originally Posted by LeeG
Ande, $.02 to throw in the hopper, I've been commuting with a CC for a couple years with racks in the front or rear and pannier loads in the front and rear. What I've found is that the CC handles a lot better with panniers in the front than back. When out of the saddle and sprinting when there's panniers on the rear the whole bike kind of whips about a bit, with the panniers in the front it feels like the whole bike is a lot more solid and ones line is a lot straighter and turns more predictable.
Sprinting with loaded front and rear panniers?.... kind of like how a fully loaded semi 'sprints' off the mark?
__________________
"Surely one can love his own country without becoming hopelessly lost in an all-consuming flame of narrow-minded nationalism" - Fred Birchmore
Cyclaholic is offline  
Old 09-10-11, 04:19 PM
  #44  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 5,202
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 138 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 81 Times in 64 Posts
Originally Posted by Cyclaholic
Sprinting with loaded front and rear panniers?.... kind of like how a fully loaded semi 'sprints' off the mark?
er,,sprinting with ONLY front OR rear panniers. When commuting along at 12-15mph and you want to get to the turn or in line with other vehicles going 20-25mph one sprints from a cruising velocity, there's no sprinting from a standing start. Out of the saddle,pulling on the bars, whether going slowly up a hill or quickly on the flats torques the frame differently than sitting and pedaling hard. The OP criteria seem to be commuting and fast riding. The CC handles much better with load on the front with out of saddle efforts.
LeeG is offline  
Old 09-10-11, 07:06 PM
  #45  
Senior Member
 
powitte's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Chicago
Posts: 179
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Surly does a great job of marketing, which is one reason why they've become oh so popular. But to me, it's really getting to be a turn off. For example, on the CC (and other frames of theirs), they space the rear dropouts to 132.5. Good idea--it can take mountain or road standard hubs. But, a number of other manufacturers are doing this; it's nothing too special. Surly feels obligated to name this spacing, as if it's proprietary: "Gnot-rite." They can't even resist the temptation to turn that into something absurd.

They make great products. Really. You'd be happy with it. But all that marketing has a price tag which you're paying directly. And, I would just feel dirty allowing myself to be seduced by their obnoxious branding. Please do consider other frames as well with similar qualities to the CC. Look into Soma frames or something by Civia as well. They're probably comparable quality, cheaper, with less theft risk.
powitte is offline  
Old 09-11-11, 06:35 AM
  #46  
Senior Member
 
MrCjolsen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Davis CA
Posts: 3,959

Bikes: Surly Cross-Check, '85 Giant road bike (unrecogizable fixed-gear conversion

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 3 Posts
I probably have about 20,000 commuting miles on my Crosscheck. I bought it used in 2006, replaced every single part over the next four years then crashed it and replaced the frame. I think the only part left on it from when I got it is the rear brake.

The frame has two drawbacks. First, it has a short head tube. In order to have my bars up where I like them, I need lots of spacers on my very long steer tube. No problems, but it does make the bike look a little funny.

The other is the horizontal drops. Sure, you can run it as a single speed. But if you are not actually going to do that, then they are a pain.
MrCjolsen is offline  
Old 09-11-11, 06:40 AM
  #47  
Senior Member
 
irwin7638's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Kalamazoo, Mi.
Posts: 3,097

Bikes: Sam, The Hunq and that Old Guy, Soma Buena Vista, Giant Talon 2, Brompton

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 102 Post(s)
Liked 106 Times in 48 Posts
Why not get a Cross-Check? Hmmmmm....I got nothin'

Marc
irwin7638 is offline  
Old 09-11-11, 03:41 PM
  #48  
Senior Member
 
Thor29's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 757
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I didn't like the 132.5mm spacing combined with semi-horizontal dropouts. It makes it tougher to get a mountain bike hub in there and requires too much QR force to hold a road hub.
Thor29 is offline  
Old 09-11-11, 04:12 PM
  #49  
Senior Member
 
Shimagnolo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Zang's Spur, CO
Posts: 9,086
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3392 Post(s)
Liked 5,571 Times in 2,890 Posts
Originally Posted by Thor29
I didn't like the 132.5mm spacing combined with semi-horizontal dropouts. It makes it tougher to get a mountain bike hub in there and requires too much QR force to hold a road hub.
Yes, my Soma DoubleCross has that spacing and it is annoying.
It takes two hands to spread the dropouts, then with your third hand you push in the wheel.
Shimagnolo is offline  
Old 09-11-11, 04:26 PM
  #50  
The Left Coast, USA
 
FrenchFit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,757

Bikes: Bulls, Bianchi, Koga, Trek, Miyata

Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 361 Post(s)
Liked 25 Times in 18 Posts
Assuming it was a serious question: Weight, geometry, canti brakes, robin's egg color, non-aero, etc.
FrenchFit is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.