The first photo of the American M1A1 Abrams tank from Ukraine has been published

49
The first photo of the American M1A1 Abrams tank from Ukraine has been published

The photo is illustrative.


Tanks American-made M1A1 Abrams are already on the territory of Ukraine in the presence of units of the Ukrainian Armed Forces. Recently, the first photo of an American M1A1 Abrams tank from Ukraine was published on the Internet.



Earlier it became known about the transfer of 31 American-made Abrams tanks to the Ukrainian Armed Forces by the US Department of Defense. True, there is still no information that Ukrainian formations have begun to use these tanks in combat.

Ukrainian crews were specially trained for Abrams tanks. But now, probably, the command of the Armed Forces of Ukraine is afraid to use these vehicles during combat operations, remembering the no better fate of the German Leopard tanks and British Challenger 2 tanks. Both German and British tanks were successfully destroyed and are being destroyed by Russian troops in the combat zone, primarily in Zaporozhye and South Donetsk directions.


Abrams tank in Ukraine


There is no doubt that as soon as Abrams tanks appear on the line of combat contact, they will face the same fate as the previously transferred German and British tanks. This should have been understood in the United States, but the decision to transfer tanks was made even before the mass destruction of Western military equipment began in the Zaporozhye and South Donetsk directions.

Now, probably, the American military is not very happy that Abrams tanks will begin to be destroyed during combat use, and this will not be the best advertisement for potential buyers of American military equipment.
49 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +5
    6 November 2023 14: 45
    The photo is so-so...nothing, nothing from anywhere.
    1. +4
      6 November 2023 14: 52
      Aerodrome hi, it’s interesting here, after the Americans removed everything that they considered secret from their Abrams, which tank did it become closer to in terms of generation? That is, the fact that this is not the latest version was initially clear, but now how “old” has it become?
      1. +14
        6 November 2023 15: 00
        Quote: Murmur 55
        Aerodrome hi, it’s interesting here, after the Americans removed everything that they considered secret from their Abrams, which tank did it become closer to in terms of generation?

        Without a black loader, Abrams's combat effectiveness drops significantly. And blacks are not included in the package))).
        1. -1
          6 November 2023 17: 27
          They will give Mykola shoe polish and say that this is necessary for the loader
        2. +1
          6 November 2023 18: 02
          They'll cover you with soot - he'll pass for a loader and a part-time chimney sweep good laughing
        3. +6
          6 November 2023 23: 21
          Quote: Michael

          Without a black loader, Abrams's combat effectiveness drops significantly. And blacks are not included in the package))).
          There are blacks in Ukraine... fellow
          They will mobilize you into the Ukrainian Armed Forces and put you straight into Abrams.
          sad
    2. +6
      6 November 2023 15: 05
      American-made M1A1 Abrams tanks are already in Ukraine


      Please tell me where they can be found, otherwise they have already been searched. The place at Patriot has already been prepared and the tickets are sold out...
  2. -5
    6 November 2023 14: 45
    M1A1 Abrams Welcome to HELL! am
    1. +2
      6 November 2023 14: 52
      The whole point is that the Americans have already understood and declared that there will be no further modernization of the M1. And they don’t care about Abram’s reputation. They are developing a new car
      1. +2
        6 November 2023 17: 28
        But you can still sell existing ones from storage. Dear Poles and other Balts will pay at least triple the price, out of friendship.
  3. -3
    6 November 2023 14: 47
    Who will give us tanks? At least 30 pieces...
    1. +3
      6 November 2023 14: 50
      certero hi, but we have enough tanks of our own.
    2. +4
      6 November 2023 14: 51
      Laos transferred just about 30 units, T34-85.
    3. +2
      6 November 2023 14: 54
      Not all at once. They only have 31 Abrams. They'll pass it on later. And why do we need 30 Abrams? One kiss for Cuban... request
      1. +1
        6 November 2023 15: 00
        a dozen can be transferred to Mosfilm to make films
        1. +7
          6 November 2023 15: 05
          faiver hi, what kind of movies our leading film studios are making now, it’s better not to.
          1. 0
            8 November 2023 09: 59
            Are you talking about "Challenge"?
      2. -3
        6 November 2023 15: 03
        Quote: igorbrsv
        One kiss for Cuban...

        2 pieces per Kubinka! And a couple to Uralvagonzavod.
    4. +3
      6 November 2023 15: 25
      For what purpose do you need these tanks??? For show-off and beauty? Or how??? fool
      We have enough of our own in different models and modifications. soldier
  4. -4
    6 November 2023 14: 47
    For each Abram you need an average of 2....3 Lancet-3.
    1. +3
      6 November 2023 14: 52
      Better than a 120 mm mine on top of his turret....
      Guaranteed to be enough for him....
      1. 0
        6 November 2023 14: 58
        Quote: Nexcom
        Better than a 120 mm mine on top of his turret....
        Guaranteed to be enough for him....

        How many mines do you need to fire to hit the tower?
        1. 0
          6 November 2023 17: 29
          It has a big turret, it's easier to hit
    2. +2
      6 November 2023 14: 54
      Rumata hi, it depends where that Lancet will fly into, and this depends on the skill of the operator and on the counteraction to the electronic warfare of the Ukrainian Armed Forces.
      1. -3
        6 November 2023 15: 01
        Quote: Murmur 55
        it depends where that Lancet will fly, and this depends on the skill of the operator and on the counteraction of the electronic warfare of the Ukrainian Armed Forces.

        Therefore, you need not one, but 2....3.
    3. -2
      6 November 2023 14: 56
      Like firing a burst at him? Why the second one?
      1. -1
        6 November 2023 15: 00
        Quote: igorbrsv
        Like firing a burst at him? Why the second one?

        About half of the Lancets hit the target accurately.
      2. +3
        6 November 2023 21: 29
        Quote: igorbrsv
        Why the second?

        The second one is needed for BURNING out the insides or detonation of the ammunition.
        The first one immobilizes, the second one destroys, guaranteed. Because Ukrainians “knocked out” by one Lancet are evacuated from the battlefield and restored, or used for spare parts (cannibalized for organs). The tactics have already been developed: attack from above into the rear part of the tower, where he has a spare ammunition and an auxiliary diesel generator. If you miss, you end up in the KMO... That’s also good: changing an engine is not very easy - there are not enough engines!
        1. +2
          7 November 2023 07: 15
          On those videos that are published, this is basically how they attack. To the rear of the tower. BMPs and self-propelled guns are just in the stern.
    4. +1
      6 November 2023 15: 27
      Not necessarily 2-3 Lancets. With a skillful and correct approach, just one is enough to destroy this “abram”...
    5. BAI
      +4
      6 November 2023 16: 12
      1 Cornet. In any projection at a distance of up to 6 km.
      1. +4
        7 November 2023 19: 01
        I’ll continue, one “Whirlwind” from 6 km to 10 km
    6. +5
      6 November 2023 17: 30
      It is unlikely that the lancet will be able to fly 500 km to these abrams. Now they are protected by absolute armor - the deepest rear
  5. +4
    6 November 2023 14: 55
    The first photo of the American M1A1 Abrams tank from Ukraine has been published
    . It will either get stuck or burn out... although it may turn out to be both at the same time.
  6. +1
    6 November 2023 15: 09
    It would be better to immediately transfer it to Kubinka. Will decorate the collection. Otherwise, then take it from the battlefield, tidy it up from the remains of living creatures, and drag it to the museum. That's a hemorrhage.
  7. +2
    6 November 2023 15: 15
    Bien escondido..y con mucho miedo..jajajaj
  8. BAI
    +1
    6 November 2023 16: 09
    As I already wrote, in 1982, 3 Abrams and 3 T-72A collided for the first time in Syria. The score is 2:1 in our favor. Since then, the Abrams and the T-72 have developed. The question is - who is bigger?, while in Ukraine there will be cropped Abrams that do not have all the available capabilities
    1. -1
      7 November 2023 09: 53
      This was not the case. Already discussed.
  9. +1
    6 November 2023 16: 56
    Quote: Aerodrome
    The photo is so-so...nothing, nothing from anywhere.

    That's it...! They are waiting..., probably, for the cameramen from “Hollywood” to catch up.... well, so that they can film “from the right angle”..., like “mission impossible”... winked
  10. +3
    6 November 2023 17: 41
    There is no doubt that as soon as Abrams tanks appear on the line of combat contact, they will face the same fate as the previously transferred German and British tanks.
    belay K. Ryabov???
  11. +2
    6 November 2023 18: 25
    From the photo it looks like it is buried up to the tower.
  12. +1
    6 November 2023 18: 28
    What are they doing there, even if it’s the first time they’ve been photographed? tongue
  13. +1
    6 November 2023 18: 36
    Brothers, respect to the first one who burned Abrashka. In absentia!
  14. +1
    6 November 2023 19: 04
    I’m embarrassed to ask - where can you see that it’s Abram? And where can you see that this photo was taken in Ukraine?
    1. +4
      7 November 2023 19: 05
      The tilt of the upper armor plate (it will be very convenient to attack drones from FPV), the tracks. The tower is turned back.
  15. +2
    6 November 2023 23: 50
    thee,s should not have even been allowed to set foot in ukelele land
    why wait for them to do damage to RU troops and infrastructures

    they should have been destroyed as soon as they crossed the borders

    ors as the west says, we reserve the right to strike in another country to safeguard our saftey

    well 2 should be able to play that game
    they are constantly toying with he RU, hoping that the RU will not do as they doo

    some stern warnings need to be given, then strike if not abided by.
  16. The comment was deleted.
  17. 0
    7 November 2023 12: 14
    Let's see. I saw a video of testing the destruction of the T 72 by Abrams. The turret was blown away like a hat by the wind. It was warped
  18. +2
    7 November 2023 17: 10
    There is so much noise around Western tanks as if it were the Death Star from a famous movie.
  19. +1
    7 November 2023 21: 31
    Hunting season is open! We are waiting for reports about the damaged Abrams and the whining of the xoxlov that there are not enough tanks, the tanks are so-so, by accident, etc. (Underline whatever applicable! laughing )